<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Drugging the Mother-in-Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://derekwwade.net/blog/2009/04/06/drugging-the-mother-in-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://derekwwade.net/blog/2009/04/06/drugging-the-mother-in-law/</link>
	<description>the way which can be named is not the true way</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:54:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://derekwwade.net/blog/2009/04/06/drugging-the-mother-in-law/comment-page-1/#comment-27663</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derekwwade.net/blog/?p=74#comment-27663</guid>
		<description>You are right, the key of success is to keep Scrum simple. If you try to modify it by -mainly- adding useless things just because it exist in your organisation, you will fail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right, the key of success is to keep Scrum simple. If you try to modify it by -mainly- adding useless things just because it exist in your organisation, you will fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://derekwwade.net/blog/2009/04/06/drugging-the-mother-in-law/comment-page-1/#comment-27512</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derekwwade.net/blog/?p=74#comment-27512</guid>
		<description>....we reduce the amount we have to “interpret” ....
I like the way you phrased that. It has seemed to be a game of focus and in the case of scrum a better focus than what we have had before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;.we reduce the amount we have to “interpret” &#8230;.<br />
I like the way you phrased that. It has seemed to be a game of focus and in the case of scrum a better focus than what we have had before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://derekwwade.net/blog/2009/04/06/drugging-the-mother-in-law/comment-page-1/#comment-27474</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 11:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derekwwade.net/blog/?p=74#comment-27474</guid>
		<description>hey, I wanted to send you the link to that book we talked about, but your email account is bouncing.   Is there another address I can contact you at?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey, I wanted to send you the link to that book we talked about, but your email account is bouncing.   Is there another address I can contact you at?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

