Comments on: The Affinity Definition Game http://derekwwade.net/blog/2006/04/16/the-affinity-definition-game/ the way which can be named is not the true way Sat, 26 Jun 2010 04:47:12 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Derek http://derekwwade.net/blog/2006/04/16/the-affinity-definition-game/comment-page-1/#comment-4 Derek Tue, 02 May 2006 12:40:49 +0000 http://derekwwade.net/blog/2006/04/16/the-affinity-definition-game/#comment-4 "In fact, it's hard to play the Affinity Game without having fun!" And I think that might be a large portion of why it could work. (I almost said "why it works," but 1 is not a sufficiently large sample size ;) “In fact, it’s hard to play the Affinity Game without having fun!”

And I think that might be a large portion of why it could work. (I almost said “why it works,” but 1 is not a sufficiently large sample size ;)

]]> By: Jason Huggins http://derekwwade.net/blog/2006/04/16/the-affinity-definition-game/comment-page-1/#comment-3 Jason Huggins Mon, 01 May 2006 02:56:19 +0000 http://derekwwade.net/blog/2006/04/16/the-affinity-definition-game/#comment-3 Derek, I think you're onto something here. :-) This kinda reminds me of a post I made about a few months ago titled the "Real Definition of Web 2.0" (http://jrandolph.com/blog/?p=14). In retrospect, I was just playing the affinity game for fun. In fact, it's hard to play the Affinity Game without having fun! Cheers, Jason Derek, I think you’re onto something here. :-)

This kinda reminds me of a post I made about a few months ago titled the “Real Definition of Web 2.0″ (http://jrandolph.com/blog/?p=14). In retrospect, I was just playing the affinity game for fun. In fact, it’s hard to play the Affinity Game without having fun!

Cheers,
Jason

]]>